change detection
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Asia > China > Shaanxi Province > Xi'an (0.06)
- Europe > Germany > Brandenburg > Potsdam (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Law (0.70)
- Government (0.67)
- Energy > Renewable (0.31)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.15)
- Europe > Germany > Brandenburg > Potsdam (0.04)
- Asia > China > Shanghai > Shanghai (0.04)
- (9 more...)
- Workflow (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.46)
- Law (1.00)
- Government (0.93)
- Information Technology (0.69)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hubei Province > Wuhan (0.04)
- Africa (0.04)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.93)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.67)
- Asia > Pakistan (0.05)
- Oceania > Australia (0.04)
- North America > Honduras (0.04)
- (9 more...)
- Banking & Finance (1.00)
- Health & Medicine (0.93)
- Government (0.68)
Bandit Quickest Changepoint Detection
Surveillance systems [HC11] are equipped with a suite of sensors that can be switched and steered to focus attention on any target or location over a physical landscape (see Figure 1) to detect abrupt changes at any location. On the other hand, sensor suites are resource limited, and only a limited subset, among all the locations, can be probed at any time.
- Asia > India > Karnataka > Bengaluru (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > Western Australia > Perth (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- Health & Medicine (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.66)
- Asia > India > Karnataka > Bengaluru (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston (0.04)
- Europe > Greece (0.29)
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.14)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- (14 more...)
- Banking & Finance (1.00)
- Government > Regional Government (0.93)
- Law (0.68)
ChangeEventDatasetforDiscoveryfrom Spatio-temporalRemoteSensingImagery
Thus, instead of simply detecting changed pixels, we want to identify change events. We define a change event as a group of pixels over space and time that are all changed by a single event. Weareinterested indeveloping systems thatcanautomatically detectchangeeventsandassign to each a semantic label that indicates the nature of the event, e.g., forest fires, road construction etc. Identifying change events is a much more challenging problem than change detection.
- Africa > Middle East > Egypt > Cairo Governorate > Cairo (0.05)
- North America > United States > California (0.04)
Score-Based Change-Point Detection and Region Localization for Spatio-Temporal Point Processes
Zhou, Wenbin, Xie, Liyan, Zhu, Shixiang
We study sequential change-point detection for spatio-temporal point processes, where actionable detection requires not only identifying when a distributional change occurs but also localizing where it manifests in space. While classical quickest change detection methods provide strong guarantees on detection delay and false-alarm rates, existing approaches for point-process data predominantly focus on temporal changes and do not explicitly infer affected spatial regions. We propose a likelihood-free, score-based detection framework that jointly estimates the change time and the change region in continuous space-time without assuming parametric knowledge of the pre- or post-change dynamics. The method leverages a localized and conditionally weighted Hyvärinen score to quantify event-level deviations from nominal behavior and aggregates these scores using a spatio-temporal CUSUM-type statistic over a prescribed class of spatial regions. Operating sequentially, the procedure outputs both a stopping time and an estimated change region, enabling real-time detection with spatial interpretability. We establish theoretical guarantees on false-alarm control, detection delay, and spatial localization accuracy, and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach through simulations and real-world spatio-temporal event data.
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.28)
- Asia > Japan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- (5 more...)
Segment Any Change
Visual foundation models have achieved remarkable results in zero-shot image classification and segmentation, but zero-shot change detection remains an open problem. In this paper, we propose the segment any change models (AnyChange), a new type of change detection model that supports zero-shot prediction and generalization on unseen change types and data distributions.AnyChange is built on the segment anything model (SAM) via our training-free adaptation method, bitemporal latent matching.By revealing and exploiting intra-image and inter-image semantic similarities in SAM's latent space, bitemporal latent matching endows SAM with zero-shot change detection capabilities in a training-free way. We also propose a point query mechanism to enable AnyChange's zero-shot object-centric change detection capability.We perform extensive experiments to confirm the effectiveness of AnyChange for zero-shot change detection.AnyChange sets a new record on the SECOND benchmark for unsupervised change detection, exceeding the previous SOTA by up to 4.4\% F$_1$ score, and achieving comparable accuracy with negligible manual annotations (1 pixel per image) for supervised change detection.